Your search
Results 2,047 resources
-
Sylvio Normand, 2006 CanLIIDocs 203
-
In Canada, like the USA, exclusions to patentable subject matter are driven primarily by the courts. Two recent decisions by the Canadian Patent Appeal Board (one on patentability of business methods and the other on the patentability of methods of medical treatment) have highlighted the inherent difficulty of crafting exclusions to patentable subject matter grounded not on legislative intent but on judicial activism.Courts, patent examiners, and the patent appeal board should be slow to deny patents where their subject matter is considered ineligible; rather patent applications should be assessed by the traditional criteria of patentability (namely, novelty, inventiveness, and utility). If the subject matter can be made to fit within the definition of ‘invention’ (even if slightly uncomfortably), the courts should aim to ‘breathe life’ into the bare, sometimes dated, words of the patent statute. Since the patent statutes are drafted with a view to the unforeseen, any judicial interpretation of the word ‘invention’ must give deference to this vision. A theory of subject-matter eligibility is also proposed.
-
"Ce Précis se veut être un recueil de notes pour les étudiants inscrits dans un cours de propriété intellectuelle. Nous avons souhaité y intégrer l'essentiel plutôt que de nous attarder aux nombreux aspects et particularités de ce domaine du droit si fascinant. Cette construction vise à forcer les étudiants à pousser leurs réflexions, par exemple, en lien avec le sujet de l'intelligence artificielle, un des sujets que nous avons volontairement omis du Précis. Pour cette première édition, le droit d'auteur, les marques de commerce et les brevets sont abordés. Le sujet des dessins industriels fera l'objet d'une prochaine édition." --Préface.
-
“No one has advanced a just and logical reason why reward for service to the public should be extended to the inventor of a mechanical toy and denied to the genius whose patience, foresight, and effort have given a valuable new [discovery] to mankind” (Katopis CJ. Patents v patents: policy implications of recent patent legislation. St John’s Law Review 1997;71:329). The law around the world permits the granting of patents for drugs, medical devices, and cosmetic treatment of the human body. At the same time, patentability for a method of treatment of the same body is denied in some countries on various public policy grounds. Is there any logical justification for this distinction? Are methods of medical treatment not as vital to the health or even to the life of a patient as drugs or medical devices? Why is a cosmetic result patentable and a curative result not?
-
Perry, S. J. (with Currier, T. A.). (2024). Canadian patent law (Fifth edition.). LexisNexis Canada.
"This text is a modern Canadian work on patents, written by and for patent prosecutors, rather than patent litigators or legal academics. This book covers the most fundamental legal and practical issues that Canadian patent lawyers and patent agents are likely to face in everyday practice before the courts and the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO)."-- Provided by publisher.
-
AbbVie Biotechnology Ltd v Canada (Attorney General) 2014 FC 1251 Kane J 2,385,745 * – anti-TNF-α antibodies / HUMIRA dosage regime Ka...
Explore
Resource type
- Blog Post (8)
- Book (644)
- Book Section (219)
- Case (250)
- Conference Paper (3)
- Dictionary Entry (84)
- Document (2)
- Encyclopedia Article (2)
- Journal Article (812)
- Magazine Article (2)
- Newspaper Article (2)
- Preprint (3)
- Presentation (1)
- Report (11)
- Thesis (3)
- Web Page (1)
Topics
- Aboriginal law (4)
- Aboriginal peoples (2)
- Abuse of process (5)
- Access to information (1)
- Administrative law (11)
- Admissibility (1)
- Appeals (5)
- Arrest (2)
- Bankruptcy and insolvency (6)
- Banks (1)
- Canada (2)
- Charge to jury (2)
- Charter of Rights (32)
- Child and family services (1)
- Choice of forum (1)
- Civil liability (1)
- Civil procedure (5)
- Communications law (1)
- Constitutional law (54)
- Contracts (2)
- Copyright (8)
- Copyright Pentalogy (5)
- Costs (1)
- Court having jurisdiction (1)
- Courts (8)
- Criminal law (89)
- Crown law (1)
- Custody (4)
- Declaration of invalidity (1)
- Discoverability (1)
- Division of powers (4)
- Evidence (16)
- Expropriation (2)
- Extraterritoriality (1)
- Family law (7)
- Fiduciary duty (1)
- Financial institutions (1)
- Fitness to stand trial (1)
- Habeas corpus (1)
- Human rights (1)
- Immigration (3)
- Impaired driving (2)
- Income tax (4)
- Informer privilege (1)
- Infringement (2)
- Insurance (2)
- Intellectual property (9)
- Judicial review (5)
- Jurisdiction (5)
- Labour relations (1)
- Limitation of actions (1)
- Mediation (1)
- Negligence (1)
- Obligation of loyalty (1)
- Obstructing justice (1)
- Occupational health and safety (1)
- Open court principle (1)
- Patents (1)
- Prerogative writs (1)
- Prescription (1)
- Private international law (2)
- Property (1)
- Prosecutorial immunity (1)
- Provincial offences (1)
- Publication bans (1)
- Real property (1)
- Right to security of person (1)
- Sale of goods (1)
- Securities (2)
- Sentencing (9)
- Sex workers (1)
- Sexual assault (6)
- Status of persons (1)
- Statutes (1)
- Taxation (6)
- Telecommunications (1)
- Torts (1)
- Trafficking in persons (1)
- Transportation law (2)
- Treaty rights (1)
- Trial (5)
- Voyeurism (1)
- Young persons (2)
Publication year
-
Between 2000 and 2026
- Between 2000 and 2009 (479)
- Between 2010 and 2019 (775)
- Between 2020 and 2026 (793)